Бесплатный урок с нашим репетитором!

Узнать подробнее

Новая Школа - онлайн-школа подготовки к ЕГЭ
При поддержке
Посмотреть все вопросы нейросети
Бесплатный пробный урок с репетитором

Узнай больше про репетиторов Новой Школы и запишись на бесплатный пробный урок. Мы проверим твой уровень знаний и составим план обучения по любому предмету и классу

Вопрос от Анонимного юзера 10 июля 2025 05:58

16. Saying sympathy is in short supply these days, the author means that... 1) people tend to blame sick people in their sickness. 2) meat eaters do not deserve her sympathy. 3) society neglects people who have problems. 4) overweight people should pay more. Meat eaters you are daredevils or dumb. Or both. I am a vegetarian as well as my parents and all my family members. I've been a vegetarian for as long as I can remember. There have been times during my years of vegetarianism when I've wondered if I may indeed grow out of it. I've wondered if there might come a day when I'll put aside my childish aversion to the thought of dead stuff travelling through my intestines, like a corpse on a raft ride. However, it could never happen, and not because I'm so enlightened, sensitive or any of the other euphemisms for whining hippie usually dumped on vegetarians. My conversion to flesh-eating couldn't happen because, frankly, I'm not stupid enough. As in, I can read. Analysis of more than 6,000 pancreatic cancer cases published in the British Journal of Cancer says that eating just 50g of processed meat a day (one sausage or a couple of slices of bacon) raises the likelihood of pancreatic cancer by a fifth. lOOg a day (the equivalent of a medium burger) raises it by 38%, 150g by 57%. Men are worst hit, as they tend to eat the most processed meat. And while pancreatic cancer is not the most common of cancers, it's frequently diagnosed late, with four-fifths of sufferers dying within a year of diagnosis. It should be pointed out that this is about processed meat. However, many past studies have stated a probable link between too much meat and all manner of cancers and heart problems, as well as links to other conditions, from diabetes and high blood pressure to obesity and Alzheimer's. If, by now, you're thinking that I'm out to shock you, then you couldn't be more wrong. I'd be shocked if any of this was considered new enough to shock anyone. This information has popped up regularly for years in all forms of popular media - newspapers and numerous TV and radio programs, to say nothing of the Internet. Indeed, in this era of info overload, if you've never come across the burgers and kebabs are unhealthy revelation, one would have to presume you've been lying in a coma. Sympathy is in short supply these days. You can't move for people being blamed for their own miserable situations: smokers who burden the NHS; alcoholics who don't deserve liver transplants; obese people who should pay more for flights. By this logic, people who've been regularly informed of the dangers of meat, particularly the cheap processed variety, but who continue to wolf it down should be held just as accountable. Yet if these meat eaters are mentioned at all, it's in general poor lifestyle terms, as an afterthought to drinking, smoking, and lack of exercise. You just don't get people making emotional pronouncements about bacon lovers not deserving cancer treatment or kebab fans burdening the NHS. It's not as if they haven't been warned countless times about the dangers -how willfully ill-informed can people be? Or maybe they're just hard. In fact, when I say I'm not dumb enough to eat meat, I should probably add brave enough. With so much frightening information, so readily available for so long, the modern committed carnivore must have nerves of steel. And yet, we should admit it, meat eaters still predominate and even grow in number. Must all of them be deaf and blind, and immune to a general sense of self-safety?

Ответ нейросети

10 июля 2025 05:58

Привет! Всё хорошо, давай разберемся вместе. В задании говорится о фразе «sympathy is in short supply these days», что переводится как «сострадания в последнее время не так много». То есть, автор говорит, что сейчас люди мало сочувствуют другим, особенно тем, у кого есть проблемы.

Твой ответ — «1), люди склонны винить больных в их болезни» — немного не подходит, потому что в основном текст говорит о том, что людей обвиняют в их несчастьях, но прямо не о том, что они, например, винят больных. В основном, автор критикует отношение общества к разным категориям людей, например, к курильщикам, алкоголикам, obese людям, и о разницы в реакции на них.

Правильный ответ — это №3: «общество пренебрегает людьми с проблемами» — именно эту идею автор подчеркивает в основном тексте, говоря о недостатке сочувствия и о том, что к людям с проблемами относились без должного внимания и сочувствия.

Объясню чуть подробнее: автор жалуется, что сейчас мало сочувствия, и приводит примеры, показывающие, что общество быстро обвиняет, а не помогает, особенно тем, кто сталкивается с проблемами (например, из-за вредных привычек). В конце он акцентирует, что многие люди игнорируют страдания других, и это связано с недостатком сочувствия.

Если бы я был на твоем месте, я бы выбрал именно №3, потому что именно эта идея мастерски выражена в тексте.

Понимаешь, как сюда пришел вывод? Если опять возникнут вопросы — спрашивай, я помогу! И оцени мой ответ лайком или дизлайком.

Задай свой вопрос

Напиши любую задачу или вопрос, а нейросеть её решит

Похожие вопросы 15

Бесплатно Мобильное приложение ГДЗ
Мобильное приложение ГДЗ

Задавай вопросы искуcственному интеллекту текстом или фотографиями в приложении на iPhone или Android

qr-codegoogle-playapp-store

Саша — ассистент в телеграмме

16. Saying sympathy is in short supply these days, the author means that... 1) people tend to blame sick people in their sickness. 2) meat eaters do not deserve her sympathy. 3) society neglects people who have problems. 4) overweight people should pay more. Meat eaters you are daredevils or dumb. Or both. I am a vegetarian as well as my parents and all my family members. I've been a vegetarian for as long as I can remember. There have been times during my years of vegetarianism when I've wondered if I may indeed grow out of it. I've wondered if there might come a day when I'll put aside my childish aversion to the thought of dead stuff travelling through my intestines, like a corpse on a raft ride. However, it could never happen, and not because I'm so enlightened, sensitive or any of the other euphemisms for whining hippie usually dumped on vegetarians. My conversion to flesh-eating couldn't happen because, frankly, I'm not stupid enough. As in, I can read. Analysis of more than 6,000 pancreatic cancer cases published in the British Journal of Cancer says that eating just 50g of processed meat a day (one sausage or a couple of slices of bacon) raises the likelihood of pancreatic cancer by a fifth. lOOg a day (the equivalent of a medium burger) raises it by 38%, 150g by 57%. Men are worst hit, as they tend to eat the most processed meat. And while pancreatic cancer is not the most common of cancers, it's frequently diagnosed late, with four-fifths of sufferers dying within a year of diagnosis. It should be pointed out that this is about processed meat. However, many past studies have stated a probable link between too much meat and all manner of cancers and heart problems, as well as links to other conditions, from diabetes and high blood pressure to obesity and Alzheimer's. If, by now, you're thinking that I'm out to shock you, then you couldn't be more wrong. I'd be shocked if any of this was considered new enough to shock anyone. This information has popped up regularly for years in all forms of popular media - newspapers and numerous TV and radio programs, to say nothing of the Internet. Indeed, in this era of info overload, if you've never come across the burgers and kebabs are unhealthy revelation, one would have to presume you've been lying in a coma. Sympathy is in short supply these days. You can't move for people being blamed for their own miserable situations: smokers who burden the NHS; alcoholics who don't deserve liver transplants; obese people who should pay more for flights. By this logic, people who've been regularly informed of the dangers of meat, particularly the cheap processed variety, but who continue to wolf it down should be held just as accountable. Yet if these meat eaters are mentioned at all, it's in general poor lifestyle terms, as an afterthought to drinking, smoking, and lack of exercise. You just don't get people making emotional pronouncements about bacon lovers not deserving cancer treatment or kebab fans burdening the NHS. It's not as if they haven't been warned countless times about the dangers -how willfully ill-informed can people be? Or maybe they're just hard. In fact, when I say I'm not dumb enough to eat meat, I should probably add brave enough. With so much frightening information, so readily available for so long, the modern committed carnivore must have nerves of steel. And yet, we should admit it, meat eaters still predominate and even grow in number. Must all of them be deaf and blind, and immune to a general sense of self-safety?
Привет! Всё хорошо, давай разберемся вместе. В задании говорится о фразе «sympathy is in short supply these days», что переводится как «сострадания в последнее время не так много». То есть, автор говорит, что сейчас люди мало сочувствуют другим, особенно тем, у кого есть проблемы. Твой ответ — «1), люди склонны винить больных в их болезни» — немного не подходит, потому что в основном текст говорит о том, что людей обвиняют в их несчастьях, но прямо не о том, что они, например, винят больных. В основном, автор критикует отношение общества к разным категориям людей, например, к курильщикам, алкоголикам, obese людям, и о разницы в реакции на них. Правильный ответ — это №3: «общество пренебрегает людьми с проблемами» — именно эту идею автор подчеркивает в основном тексте, говоря о недостатке сочувствия и о том, что к людям с проблемами относились без должного внимания и сочувствия. Объясню чуть подробнее: автор жалуется, что сейчас мало сочувствия, и приводит примеры, показывающие, что общество быстро обвиняет, а не помогает, особенно тем, кто сталкивается с проблемами (например, из-за вредных привычек). В конце он акцентирует, что многие люди игнорируют страдания других, и это связано с недостатком сочувствия. Если бы я был на твоем месте, я бы выбрал именно №3, потому что именно эта идея мастерски выражена в тексте. Понимаешь, как сюда пришел вывод? Если опять возникнут вопросы — спрашивай, я помогу! И оцени мой ответ лайком или дизлайком.