Бесплатный урок с нашим репетитором!

Узнать подробнее

Новая Школа - онлайн-школа подготовки к ЕГЭ
При поддержке
Посмотреть все вопросы нейросети
Бесплатный пробный урок с репетитором

Узнай больше про репетиторов Новой Школы и запишись на бесплатный пробный урок. Мы проверим твой уровень знаний и составим план обучения по любому предмету и классу

Вопрос от Анонимного юзера 27 апреля 2026 15:39

Внимательно прочитайте текст задания и выберите верный ответ из списка: Why did the oil company decide to send part of the profits to the bank? 1. The money belonged to the owner of the land. 2. It was required by the owner of the land. 3. They wanted to hide it from the owner of the land. 4. They wanted to buy the land out for that money. Family Fortune In 1840, times were hard for Bentley Harcourt. He had a farm inYorkshire, but it didnt make money. He wanted to marry but decided to wait until better times came along. Better times did not come along. One day, he saw a newspaper article about the American West. It sounded likethe land of milk and honey.He thought about it. He had no family. Nobody cared if he lived or died. Why not make a new life in theNew World? He sold his farm and immigrated toAmerica. After a year of drifting he found himself inTexas. He loved it. He loved the fact that you could travel for days and not meet another soul. He used his savings to buy some land. That year he died. In 1910, an oil company moved on to his land and found oil. They took millions of barrels of oil out of the ground, all the profits due to the owner of the land were paid into a bank account in Houston, where they waited for a relative to claim them. The money sat in the bank for years. By 1975, the amount stood at two billion dollars. In1975, inBradford,England, a man called David Kingsley took up a new hobbytracing his family tree. He studied church records, visited museums, checked every reference to families called Kingsley. He also checked on his mothers family. They were called Harcourt. He discovered one day that his mothers great-great uncle, a man with the splendid name of Bentley Harcourt, had sailed from Liverpool toAmerica. In the same year, shortly after learning about his great-great uncle, Kingsley read a magazine article about a fortune that lay unclaimed in a Texas bank. This article told the story of a lonely immigrant called Bentley Harcourt, and about how he had died shortly after buying his dream ranch inTexas. The magazine promised to pay the legal expenses of anyone who could claim to be a descendant and who might be entitled to the fortune. Kingsley read the story with mounting excitement. Surely, this must be the same Bentley Harcourt that he had come across during his research into his family tree! He talked the matter over with his wife and then wrote to the magazine. As it turned out, Kingsley was not the only one who claimed to be a descendant. By the end of 1977, over 60 people were claiming they were entitled to the fortune. The arguments, the quarrels, and the court cases went on, and on, and on. In the end, Kingsley did not get the money, but, funnily enough, he didnt mind. He had found something much more important. He had a great-great uncle named Bentley Harcourt, there was no doubt about that. But, amazingly, it was a different Bentley Harcourt. It seemed impossible that there could be two people with such an unusual name, but it was true. This Bentley Harcourt had settled in Orange Country,California, and had made his fortune in fish canning. He married a hardworking Swedish girl, and they had thirteen children. David Kingsley had found a different treasure: a branch of his family across theAtlantic. The two families wrote to each other. Later, they visited each other. They became the best of friends. And the fortune of the other Bentley Harcourt? It is still unclaimed. As I write this, the sum stands at 2.3 billion dollars. This may be a good moment to start tracing your family tree!

Ответ нейросети

27 апреля 2026 15:39

Класс, разберёмся по шагам.

Что правильный ответ: 1. The money belonged to the owner of the land.

Почему так:

  • В тексте сказано: "They took millions of barrels of oil out of the ground, all the profits due to the owner of the land were paid into a bank account in Houston, where they waited for a relative to claim them." Это явно говорит, что прибыль причиталась владельцу земли, т.е. принадлежала ему. Именно из-за этого часть денег кладётся на банковский счёт до момента искового требования родственником — т. е. для владельца земли.

Почему другие варианты неверны:

    1. "Это требовалось владельцу земли." Текст не говорит, что владелец требовал деньги; наоборот, деньги ждут родственника владельца, чтобы тот их предъявил. Нет указания на чёткое требование владельца.
    1. "Они хотели скрыть её от владельца земли." Нет намёка на скрывание; деньги просто лежали в банке до претендента.
    1. "Они хотели выкупить землю за эти деньги." Текст не упоминает намерения купить землю; речь идёт о выплате лицам, имеющим законное право на богатство.

Подсказка на подумать в следующий раз:

  • Ищи фразы вроде "profits due to the owner" и "paid into a bank account ... waiting for a relative to claim them" — они прямо говорят, кому принадлежит прибыль и зачем её держат в банке.

Если хочешь, могу дать ещё одно короткое задание на ту же тему — подобрать правильный ответ по аналогичной фразе из текста. Оцени мой ответ: лайк/дизлайк.

Задай свой вопрос

Напиши любую задачу или вопрос, а нейросеть её решит

Похожие вопросы 15

Бесплатно Мобильное приложение ГДЗ
Мобильное приложение ГДЗ

Задавай вопросы искуcственному интеллекту текстом или фотографиями в приложении на iPhone или Android

qr-codegoogle-playapp-store

Саша — ассистент в телеграмме

Внимательно прочитайте текст задания и выберите верный ответ из списка: Why did the oil company decide to send part of the profits to the bank? 1. The money belonged to the owner of the land. 2. It was required by the owner of the land. 3. They wanted to hide it from the owner of the land. 4. They wanted to buy the land out for that money. Family Fortune In 1840, times were hard for Bentley Harcourt. He had a farm inYorkshire, but it didnt make money. He wanted to marry but decided to wait until better times came along. Better times did not come along. One day, he saw a newspaper article about the American West. It sounded likethe land of milk and honey.He thought about it. He had no family. Nobody cared if he lived or died. Why not make a new life in theNew World? He sold his farm and immigrated toAmerica. After a year of drifting he found himself inTexas. He loved it. He loved the fact that you could travel for days and not meet another soul. He used his savings to buy some land. That year he died. In 1910, an oil company moved on to his land and found oil. They took millions of barrels of oil out of the ground, all the profits due to the owner of the land were paid into a bank account in Houston, where they waited for a relative to claim them. The money sat in the bank for years. By 1975, the amount stood at two billion dollars. In1975, inBradford,England, a man called David Kingsley took up a new hobbytracing his family tree. He studied church records, visited museums, checked every reference to families called Kingsley. He also checked on his mothers family. They were called Harcourt. He discovered one day that his mothers great-great uncle, a man with the splendid name of Bentley Harcourt, had sailed from Liverpool toAmerica. In the same year, shortly after learning about his great-great uncle, Kingsley read a magazine article about a fortune that lay unclaimed in a Texas bank. This article told the story of a lonely immigrant called Bentley Harcourt, and about how he had died shortly after buying his dream ranch inTexas. The magazine promised to pay the legal expenses of anyone who could claim to be a descendant and who might be entitled to the fortune. Kingsley read the story with mounting excitement. Surely, this must be the same Bentley Harcourt that he had come across during his research into his family tree! He talked the matter over with his wife and then wrote to the magazine. As it turned out, Kingsley was not the only one who claimed to be a descendant. By the end of 1977, over 60 people were claiming they were entitled to the fortune. The arguments, the quarrels, and the court cases went on, and on, and on. In the end, Kingsley did not get the money, but, funnily enough, he didnt mind. He had found something much more important. He had a great-great uncle named Bentley Harcourt, there was no doubt about that. But, amazingly, it was a different Bentley Harcourt. It seemed impossible that there could be two people with such an unusual name, but it was true. This Bentley Harcourt had settled in Orange Country,California, and had made his fortune in fish canning. He married a hardworking Swedish girl, and they had thirteen children. David Kingsley had found a different treasure: a branch of his family across theAtlantic. The two families wrote to each other. Later, they visited each other. They became the best of friends. And the fortune of the other Bentley Harcourt? It is still unclaimed. As I write this, the sum stands at 2.3 billion dollars. This may be a good moment to start tracing your family tree!
Класс, разберёмся по шагам. Что правильный ответ: 1. The money belonged to the owner of the land. Почему так: - В тексте сказано: "They took millions of barrels of oil out of the ground, all the profits due to the owner of the land were paid into a bank account in Houston, where they waited for a relative to claim them." Это явно говорит, что прибыль причиталась владельцу земли, т.е. принадлежала ему. Именно из-за этого часть денег кладётся на банковский счёт до момента искового требования родственником — т. е. для владельца земли. Почему другие варианты неверны: - 2. "Это требовалось владельцу земли." Текст не говорит, что владелец требовал деньги; наоборот, деньги ждут родственника владельца, чтобы тот их предъявил. Нет указания на чёткое требование владельца. - 3. "Они хотели скрыть её от владельца земли." Нет намёка на скрывание; деньги просто лежали в банке до претендента. - 4. "Они хотели выкупить землю за эти деньги." Текст не упоминает намерения купить землю; речь идёт о выплате лицам, имеющим законное право на богатство. Подсказка на подумать в следующий раз: - Ищи фразы вроде "profits due to the owner" и "paid into a bank account ... waiting for a relative to claim them" — они прямо говорят, кому принадлежит прибыль и зачем её держат в банке. Если хочешь, могу дать ещё одно короткое задание на ту же тему — подобрать правильный ответ по аналогичной фразе из текста. Оцени мой ответ: лайк/дизлайк.