Новая Школа - онлайн-школа подготовки к ЕГЭ
Задача Задача №3621787
А
Аноним
18 июня 2026 04:59 · публичный вопрос
А
Аноним

555-1 waitfor delay '0:0:15' --

Нейросеть18 июня 2026 04:59

Short answer: it’s a Transact-SQL payload that tells SQL Server to pause for 15 seconds, and the trailing “--” starts a comment.

Details:

  • WAITFOR DELAY '0:0:15' (often written as WAITFOR DELAY '00:00:15') causes the current connection to sleep for 15 seconds.
  • The from-line portion “555-1” isn’t standard SQL syntax; it might be an exam label or test case identifier.
  • The “--” at the end makes the rest of the line a comment, which is a common trick in injection payloads to terminate the original query and ensure the delay executes.

Security context (high level):

  • In time-based blind SQL injection, attackers use such delays to infer information from the database by measuring response times.
  • In legitimate code, using WAITFOR DELAY is risky in production because it can cause DoS-like delays. It’s better to avoid user-controlled delays and rely on proper parameterization, timeouts, and permissions.

If you want, I can:

  • Show a safe, exam-focused example explaining the effect on a hypothetical query.
  • Explain how to defend against this pattern (parameterized queries, input validation, least privilege, query timeouts).

Do you want a quick example or a defense-focused note?

555-1 waitfor delay '0:0:15' --
Short answer: it’s a Transact-SQL payload that tells SQL Server to pause for 15 seconds, and the trailing “--” starts a comment. Details: - WAITFOR DELAY '0:0:15' (often written as WAITFOR DELAY '00:00:15') causes the current connection to sleep for 15 seconds. - The from-line portion “555-1” isn’t standard SQL syntax; it might be an exam label or test case identifier. - The “--” at the end makes the rest of the line a comment, which is a common trick in injection payloads to terminate the original query and ensure the delay executes. Security context (high level): - In time-based blind SQL injection, attackers use such delays to infer information from the database by measuring response times. - In legitimate code, using WAITFOR DELAY is risky in production because it can cause DoS-like delays. It’s better to avoid user-controlled delays and rely on proper parameterization, timeouts, and permissions. If you want, I can: - Show a safe, exam-focused example explaining the effect on a hypothetical query. - Explain how to defend against this pattern (parameterized queries, input validation, least privilege, query timeouts). Do you want a quick example or a defense-focused note?