What you posted looks like a classic SQL injection payload fragment. It tries to manipulate a query so that the WHERE clause evaluates to true regardless of the actual input.
Key idea:
- The part -1" seems to terminate a previous string literal in the SQL query.
- OR 5*5=25 is a tautology (always true). If this gets inserted into a WHERE clause, it can make the entire condition true, potentially bypassing authentication or returning more rows than intended.
- The rest ("vyHjdoKB"=") is another fragment that might be intended to extend the condition, but on its own it’s incomplete. The important bit is the OR 5*5=25 making the condition true.
In exam terms, this demonstrates:
- Why unsafely concatenating user input into SQL is dangerous.
- How boolean expressions can be used to bypass checks.
Safe defenses (how to fix in practice):
- Use parameterized queries/prepared statements rather than string concatenation.
- Vulnerable (conceptual): SELECT * FROM users WHERE username = 'USER_INPUT' AND password = 'PASSWORD';
- Secure: SELECT * FROM users WHERE username = ? AND password = ?; with parameters bound safely.
- Validate and constrain all input (allowlists, length checks).
- Use least-privilege database accounts (no rights to write/drop tables if not needed).
- Disable detailed error messages that reveal query structure.
- Consider using ORM or stored procedures with bound parameters.
- Regularly test for injection with safe, legal security testing in a controlled lab.
If you want, I can show a concise side-by-side example (vulnerable vs. secure) in a language you’re studying (e.g., Python with psycopg2, Java with JDBC, etc.).