Новая Школа - онлайн-школа подготовки к ЕГЭ
Задача Задача №3622945
А
Аноним
18 июня 2026 11:17 · публичный вопрос
А
Аноним

555Gr22SaKi' OR 762=(SELECT 762 FROM PG_SLEEP(19.946))--

Нейросеть18 июня 2026 11:17

That looks like a SQL injection payload, specifically a time-based (blind) test for PostgreSQL.

What it’s trying to do (high level)

  • It closes a string context (the trailing quote) and injects an OR condition into an existing SQL query.
  • The OR part introduces a sleep/pause via a PostgreSQL function (PG_SLEEP) to delay the response. This delay can be used to infer things about the query’s logic based on how long the server takes to respond.
  • The tail “--” is a SQL comment indicator, used to drop the rest of the original query so the injected payload isn’t syntactically disrupted.
  • The construction with 762 and a subquery is a way to tie the sleep to a boolean check; if the condition is evaluated in a certain way, the sleep occurs, letting an attacker infer information from timing.

Important notes

  • PG_SLEEP(19.946) is a time delay (about 19.9 seconds). If the injected condition causes the sleep to run, the response time increases, which is how time-based blind SQL injection works.
  • The exact syntax you pasted isn’t guaranteed to work on all PostgreSQL versions, because PG_SLEEP returns void in PostgreSQL and isn’t a normal value you can “select” from in the way the payload suggests. Still, it’s a classic style used in demonstrations of time-based SQLi.
  • This kind of payload targets vulnerable input handling (strings concatenated into SQL without proper parameterization) and is a common teaching example for SQL injection risks.

How to defend (practice-safe, exam-ready guidance)

  • Use parameterized queries / prepared statements everywhere. Do not concatenate user input into SQL strings.
    • Example (conceptual): SELECT ... FROM users WHERE username = ? AND password = ?
    • In PostgreSQL with psycopg2: cursor.execute("SELECT ... WHERE username = %s AND password = %s", (username, password))
  • Apply least privilege for database accounts. The application user should have only the permissions it needs (read/write for specific tables, not superuser).
  • Validate and sanitize input, and enforce strict length limits on fields that go into queries.
  • Use an ORM or query builder that enforces parameterization.
  • Disable or restrict dangerous functions in the data layer if possible. If you don’t need pg_sleep or similar functions, consider restricting or auditing their usage.
  • Implement input-output monitoring and anomaly detection to catch unusual query patterns or delays.
  • In testing environments, use safe, authorized labs (e.g., OWASP WebGoat, DVWA, Juice Shop) to learn about SQLi without risking real data.

If you want, I can give a concise example of how to rewrite a vulnerable query into a safe parameterized form in a language you’re studying (e.g., Python with psycopg2, Java with JDBC, PHP with PDO).

555Gr22SaKi' OR 762=(SELECT 762 FROM PG_SLEEP(19.946))--
That looks like a SQL injection payload, specifically a time-based (blind) test for PostgreSQL. What it’s trying to do (high level) - It closes a string context (the trailing quote) and injects an OR condition into an existing SQL query. - The OR part introduces a sleep/pause via a PostgreSQL function (PG_SLEEP) to delay the response. This delay can be used to infer things about the query’s logic based on how long the server takes to respond. - The tail “--” is a SQL comment indicator, used to drop the rest of the original query so the injected payload isn’t syntactically disrupted. - The construction with 762 and a subquery is a way to tie the sleep to a boolean check; if the condition is evaluated in a certain way, the sleep occurs, letting an attacker infer information from timing. Important notes - PG_SLEEP(19.946) is a time delay (about 19.9 seconds). If the injected condition causes the sleep to run, the response time increases, which is how time-based blind SQL injection works. - The exact syntax you pasted isn’t guaranteed to work on all PostgreSQL versions, because PG_SLEEP returns void in PostgreSQL and isn’t a normal value you can “select” from in the way the payload suggests. Still, it’s a classic style used in demonstrations of time-based SQLi. - This kind of payload targets vulnerable input handling (strings concatenated into SQL without proper parameterization) and is a common teaching example for SQL injection risks. How to defend (practice-safe, exam-ready guidance) - Use parameterized queries / prepared statements everywhere. Do not concatenate user input into SQL strings. - Example (conceptual): SELECT ... FROM users WHERE username = ? AND password = ? - In PostgreSQL with psycopg2: cursor.execute("SELECT ... WHERE username = %s AND password = %s", (username, password)) - Apply least privilege for database accounts. The application user should have only the permissions it needs (read/write for specific tables, not superuser). - Validate and sanitize input, and enforce strict length limits on fields that go into queries. - Use an ORM or query builder that enforces parameterization. - Disable or restrict dangerous functions in the data layer if possible. If you don’t need pg_sleep or similar functions, consider restricting or auditing their usage. - Implement input-output monitoring and anomaly detection to catch unusual query patterns or delays. - In testing environments, use safe, authorized labs (e.g., OWASP WebGoat, DVWA, Juice Shop) to learn about SQLi without risking real data. If you want, I can give a concise example of how to rewrite a vulnerable query into a safe parameterized form in a language you’re studying (e.g., Python with psycopg2, Java with JDBC, PHP with PDO).