Новая Школа - онлайн-школа подготовки к ЕГЭ
Задача Задача №3622974
А
Аноним
18 июня 2026 11:32 · публичный вопрос
А
Аноним

555'||DBMS_PIPE.RECEIVE_MESSAGE(CHR(98)||CHR(98)||CHR(98),39.892)||'

Ответ нейросети
18 июня 2026 11:32

Short interpretation (in context of Oracle SQL injection):

  • The snippet is an injection payload that tries to call Oracle’s DBMS_PIPE.RECEIVE_MESSAGE.
  • CHR(98) is the character 'b', so CHR(98)||CHR(98)||CHR(98) becomes 'bbb'. So the function is DBMS_PIPE.RECEIVE_MESSAGE('bbb',39.892).
  • The overall pattern 555'|| ... ||' is designed to break out of an existing string literal in a SQL statement and concatenate the result of the function back into the query. In effect, if the application is vulnerable, it will:
    • wait up to 39.892 seconds for a message on the pipe named 'bbb',
    • return that message (as a string),
    • and concatenate it into the surrounding SQL result (potentially leaking data or causing a delay).

Key points:

  • DBMS_PIPE.RECEIVE_MESSAGE(pipename, timeout) waits for a message on the named pipe and returns the message content.
  • The use of CHR(98) is a simple way to obfuscate the literal 'bbb' in the payload.
  • The 39.892 is a timeout in seconds (a float), controlling how long the call blocks.

Security context and defenses (high level):

  • This is a classic SQL injection attempt using a PL/SQL package (DBMS_PIPE) to exfiltrate data or cause timing/behavior changes.
  • If your app builds SQL by string concatenation and uses untrusted input, it may be vulnerable to this kind of injection.
  • Mitigations:
    • Use bind variables / prepared statements; avoid dynamic SQL built with string concatenation.
    • Validate and sanitize all input; implement white-listing where possible.
    • Principle of least privilege: restrict who can create/use DBMS_PIPE objects; monitor for unusual DBMS_PIPE usage.
    • Disable or remove DBMS_PIPE functionality if not needed in production, or at least limit its exposure.
    • Employ input-output monitoring and SQL injection scanning in test/dev and production environments.
    • Use database auditing and WAF rules that flag suspicious patterns like DBMS_PIPE calls embedded in user input (e.g., unusual CHR(...) sequences, or concatenation patterns).

If you want, I can decode similar payloads you’re studying and explain what each piece does and how to recognize it in logs.