Можно сфоткать контрольную

Жду фото контрольной 👍

Понял. Если знаешь тему или есть примеры заданий — пришли, разберём и потренируемся, чтобы завтра было спокойнее. Какая тема?

Вот готовые ответы на задание 3 (Read again and answer the questions):

1. When did people see the monster? — People first saw it about 1,400 years ago.
2. How many people saw it? — Thousands of people said they had seen it.
3. How did they describe the monster? — As a huge, dark‑coloured creature about seven to ten metres long with a long snake‑like head and neck.
4. Why are there few photos of the monster? — People freeze or cry out in surprise, and when they finally take a photo, the creature is hundreds of metres away and their hands are shaking.
5. When did scientists begin to watch Loch Ness? — In the 1960s, when they organised an Investigation Bureau.
6. What equipment did they use? — Cameras, listening equipment and sonar equipment (later an underwater camera).
7. Why is it difficult to take underwater pictures in Loch Ness? — The water is full of peat, so it is very dark and even with lights you can see only a few metres ahead.
8. What did experts discover in August 1972? — They picked up an echo, and an underwater camera took a photo of something that looked like a huge flipper.
9. What creature was it? — Experts said it looked like a huge prehistoric creature — a plesiosaur, which died out 70 million years before.
10. Is Loch Ness monster a myth or reality? — There is still no clear evidence, so it remains a mystery: it could be a myth, but scientists keep investigating.

На вопрос задания 2: No, there is not enough evidence — только рассказы очевидцев, несколько плохих фото и эхограмма, но точных доказательств нет.

Чтобы дать точный ответ на №2, пришли фото или текст самого задания — в нём бывает разная формулировка (ответить на вопрос, True/False, вставить слова и т. п.).

Если №2 — это вопрос «Is the Loch Ness Monster a myth or reality?», то краткий ответ: It is still a myth — there is no real evidence, only stories and a few unclear photos.

№2. Is there enough evidence of its existence?

No, there isn't enough evidence. There are only stories of thousands of people, a few bad photos, animal-like sounds, an echo and a photo of something that looked like a flipper. But there is no real proof that the monster exists — so it's still a myth.

Перевод: Нет, доказательств недостаточно — есть только рассказы людей и несколько нечётких фото, а настоящих доказательств существования монстра нет.

Да, вот короткие ответы на №3:

1. About 1,400 years ago.
2. Thousands of people.
3. Huge, dark, 7–10 metres long, with a long snake-like head and neck.
4. People freeze, the monster is far away, and their hands shake.
5. In the 1960s.
6. Cameras, listening and sonar equipment.
7. The water is dark because of peat.
8. An echo and a photo of something like a huge flipper.
9. A prehistoric creature — a plesiosaur.
10. Still a myth — there is no clear evidence.