Краткий ответ: вот связный устный ответ для Part 3 примерно на 1,5–2 минуты. В нём есть обе стороны, личное мнение и вывод — то есть формат «за → против → моя позиция».
Well, nowadays people often discuss whether animals should have the same legal rights as humans. There are strong arguments on both sides.
On the one hand, supporters believe that equal legal rights would prevent animal abuse and exploitation. Many animals suffer on farms or in entertainment, so clear laws could protect them and make society more compassionate. Moreover, such rights would promote ethical treatment and respect for life. Animals are living beings that deserve dignity, and this would set a good example for future generations.
On the other hand, there are serious practical problems. First, such laws would be difficult to implement and enforce, because animals cannot express their needs or take part in legal processes. It would also be very complex to create laws for all species, from pets to wildlife. Second, it could affect agriculture and research, which depend on animals for food production and medical testing. Finally, some people worry that human rights could be compromised if animal rights were given the same priority.
To be honest, I think animals definitely need strong legal protection, but giving them exactly the same rights as humans is unrealistic. Special animal welfare laws would be more practical.
To sum up, the idea is morally attractive, but it is difficult to put into practice.
Как собрать похожий ответ самому
Вступление: перефразируй тему, не читай заголовок дословно.
Nowadays people often discuss whether…Аргументы «за»: возьми 2 пункта из таблицы. На каждый — формула «тезис → пояснение».
Equal rights would prevent abuse because many animals suffer on farms and in entertainment.Аргументы «против»: тоже 2 основных пункта, третий можно коротко упомянуть.
It would be difficult to enforce because animals cannot take part in legal processes.Своё мнение: лучше не просто «я за» или «я против», а показать понимание сложности. Например: Animals need protection, but not exactly the same rights as humans.
Вывод: одно предложение-перефразировка, без новых идей.
To sum up, the idea is good in theory but hard to implement.
Проверка: обе позиции раскрыты, на каждый аргумент есть объяснение, мнение сформулировано прямо, есть связки On the one hand / Moreover / On the other hand / Finally / To sum up. Главное — не заучивать текст слово в слово, а держать эту схему.