In any translation practice, a translator stands at the crossroads of several voices: the client, the author, the translator’s own judgment, and the reader. The question of whom to listen to first is not a simple prescription but a dynamic balance that hinges on purpose, genre, and ethical considerations. This essay examines the priority order a translator might adopt, while acknowledging that different stages of a translation project require different hierarchies. The central problem is to determine a guiding principle for prioritizing voices in translation without sacrificing accuracy, fidelity, and readability. If a translator appeases only one party, the text risks miscommunication, misrepresentation, or loss of stylistic nuance. Therefore, the translator must negotiate among four interlocutors, identifying which voice should take precedence at each phase of the work. My position is that the translator should listen to the author and the reader as primary anchors, while the client and translator's own professional judgment provide essential support. In other words, the starting point is fidelity to the author's intent and the expectations of the target readership, moderated by practical constraints and the translator’s ethical responsibilities. Argument one: concepts from the Foundations of Translation From the perspective of translation theory, the concept of source-text fidelity and target-text adequacy guide the translator’s decisions. In the Foundations of Translation, key terms such as domestication versus foreignization, equivalence, and register preservation are discussed. A translator must first grasp the author’s intent, cultural nuances, and stylistic features, then render these into a coherent and accessible target text. Here the priority is the author’s message and its alignment with the reader’s comprehension, ensuring that terminology, genre conventions, and functional load are preserved. Practical experience and external sources emphasize that readers ultimately judge a translation by its readability and usefulness. If the translator ignores the reader’s needs, the text may fail to communicate, regardless of authorial intention. The client’s requirements—deadlines, budget, and intended market—shape choices about localization, terminology standardization, and tone. Therefore, in addition to authorial fidelity, the translator must negotiate with the client’s constraints and rely on personal expertise to produce a natural, coherent text for the target audience. The translator’s listening order, therefore, should begin with the author’s intent and the reader’s experience, while the client’s constraints and the translator’s professional judgment provide essential supporting guidance. This balance ensures faithful meaning, appropriate style, and effective communication across cultural and linguistic boundaries. сколько здесь английских слов?88